↓
Paste policy text to analyse
Any civic document, speech, or campaign material
EXAMPLES:
DECODER VERDICT
—
—
PERF. INDEX
—
GAP SCORE
—
DEVICES
Performativity Index
How much real-world structural change does this position actually enable?
—
PERFORMATIVITY INDEX
−100 to −60: Active Theater
Pure signal, no structural mechanism
−60 to −20: Performative
Intent without delivery pathway
−20 to +20: Neutral
Mixed or ambiguous policy signal
+20 to +60: Partial Reform
Some structural change likely
+60 to +100: Structural
Measurable, lasting real-world change
Narrative–Impact Gap Analysis
Gap score per dimension — higher = larger gap between stated intent and likely outcome
—
Rhetorical Devices Detected
Logical fallacies, cognitive biases, and deflection patterns identified in the text
Who Wins / Who Bears the Cost
Distributional analysis — which groups benefit and which are sidelined
Influence Distortion Layers
Probability each structural layer prevents the stated intent from becoming real outcome
Higher % = greater probability this layer distorts or blocks the stated policy intent
Step 1 of 6